A Blog devoted entirely to news about the University of Kentucky's Men's Basketball Team. Any e-mails and/or advertising inquiries should be sent to ukbasketball23@gmail.com.
This means that Enes will have effectively served at least a 13-game suspension, or nearly 50 percent of the season. That's greater than the prescribed penalty for receiving benefits over $1000, which is 30 percent plus repayment. So he's already being treated more harshly than others, such as Selby.
Btw, the OSU footballers who received impermissible benefits are allowed to play in the Sugar Bowl in part because "the NCAA determined they did not receive adequate rules education during the time period the violations occurred." Can UK use this rationale as well?
3 comments:
well alrighty then.
God i hate the NCAA i wish college sports would just leave and go off on there own
This means that Enes will have effectively served at least a 13-game suspension, or nearly 50 percent of the season. That's greater than the prescribed penalty for receiving benefits over $1000, which is 30 percent plus repayment. So he's already being treated more harshly than others, such as Selby.
Btw, the OSU footballers who received impermissible benefits are allowed to play in the Sugar Bowl in part because "the NCAA determined they did not receive adequate rules education during the time period the violations occurred." Can UK use this rationale as well?
Post a Comment